Wednesday, January 11, 2006


When women is perpetrator of crime

Excellent article by Rebel !!

AIDWA has been enacted only to express their shock on any women related incident even when woman is the main perpetrator of the crime. AIDWA invariably considered that women are victims and men are culprits. This is how these women organisation work. You have no rights to point fingers at the IAF authorities nor do you have any rights to interfere and dictate on the procedure of dealing with the issue. Anjali has committed a crime and do not deserve to be treated differently from men. And if you are suggested that, which you are right now, then please stop this hypcrisy that you are fighting for gender equality. The law must see crime as crime only and not on whether the crime is committed by a woman or a man. If she was sexually harassed then why did she kept quiet for so long. Why did she came up with such a bizarre accusation on some people in IAF of sexual harassment when her crime was caught ? It is a common sense that she has accuse others of sexual harassment only to strengthen her case. If she is sexually harassed then why has she kept quiet for so long and what evidence she has that she was indeed sexually harassed. If you do not attempt to attain gender equality then please say so openly in the society. Do not try to fool people of supporting women only to harass innocent men under the garb of gender equality. AIDWA should not be allowed to enter this issue since they are not interested in truth. They just want to rage a war with men in the society by hook or by crook misusing laws. Excessive condolence to these type of women will only increase such crime in the future in the Government authorities and private sector. It seems this is what these women organisation want.

Tuesday, January 10, 2006


AIDWA clearly is a non-democratic

AIDWA clearly is a non-democratic

Written by Aggarwala

AIDWA clearly is a non-democratic, partisan and a gender biased
organisation as it wants special rights for women when they have
committed the same crimes as men even in the armed forces. What does
it mean by saying that the laws should be sensitive to women? On one
hand these women organisations want equality of rights with men in
all respects, but fail to accept equality of responsibility.

Sexual harassment has become a weapon to intimidate and abuse by
women to falsely implicate any superiors exercising disciplinary
powers over them. So far they have played such games in the civil
life by falsely accusing not only husbands, but their whole families
(even including old infirm father& mother, pregnant sisters, and
small kids) under 498A, under anti-dowry law, to blackmail them and
to extort money from them reportedly in lakhs. Mere accusation by
girls uner 498A can send the whole family to prison!! There they have
not been sensitive either to the women in the boy’s family, or even
the children, but just wanted to exploit the patently absurd laws for
monetary gains. Now they want to be able to blackmail service
officers by playing similar games, to put the national security at
risk. The need actually is to protect services from this blackmail by
these partisan women activists. There is also a need to punish those
women severely who level false charges of sexual harassment, to
double their punishment, to what is carried by the sexual harassment
charge, if proved. Sexual harassment is a serious charge, and if
allowed to be used frivilously, can destroy not only the good name
and career of the concerned officer, but even the morale of the
services, and subject the services to blackmail by foreign enemy
agents who can pay up the female employees of the services to
implicate such officers. It can thus be effectively used to conduct
espionage in the services through such women employees. The services
and the responsible members of the media, civil polity, and the
judiciary must guard against any misuse, which is reported to be
rampant by misuse of 498A by most of young girls these days, under
the cover and help of such women’s organisations. Most of such
organisations reportedly operate under the guidance and help from
foreign sources. Their evil designs must be nipped in the bud.

Sunday, January 08, 2006


What about my Rights as NRI?

I am an NRI, and I am a man. Is it so inconceivable by the Indian Government to see that NRI husbands also go through
a) Cheating by their scheming wife and her family.
b) Domestic violence by his wife
c) Desertation by his wife (who packs up her bags and leaves to India and file false 498a case on him and his family)

What is the future of India, PIO, NRI if the government is so blind to acknowledge NRI husbands and his family issues.

Woman NRIs to have cell by Dec.

Hyderabad, Jan. 8: The Union ministry of overseas Indian affairs will set up a gender cell to take up the cause of women NRI and Persons of Indian Origin (PIO) in their respective countries. Ranjana Kumari, president of Women Power Connect, a woman rights body, said here that the Centre had agreed to set up the gender cell in New Delhi by December this year. She said that the Compulsory Registration of Marriages Bill will be introduced in Parliament during 2006 to help protect the interests of Indian women, particularly those settled abroad.

Ms Kumari is in the city to deliver a talk on gender equity and social concerns of overseas Indians on beh-alf of the Union ministry of overseas Indian affairs at Pravasi Bharatiya Divas here on Monday. She told reporters on Sunday that 12.8 per cent of Indian women in the US are subjected to domestic violence. She said Indian women settled abroad face mainly three types of problems: marriage related issues, pr-oblems of emigrant Indian women in Gulf and child adoption. She demanded that State governments set up special cells to provide free legal aid to Indian women victims abroad. She said that the cells should verify documents of NRI grooms like social security number at the time of marriage to prevent cheating of women.

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?