Sunday, June 04, 2006
Modern Naari and 498a
Women and children need protection - is the premise of Indian Constitution.
Not any more.
The terms and conditions of the game are changing and government should take a notice of that.
Please have a look at the blog "Present India : Blame it on Men"
It made me curious about this bold woman. I did some internet search and found this article : Rakhi Sawant – Boldness Unlimited!
Text is reproduced below. You and your brain is the best judge of this situation.
- Satya
Rakhi Sawant – Boldness Unlimited!
04th Oct 2005 13.26 IST
By ApunKaChoice Bureau
The hot Rakhi Sawant isn’t just good at shedding clothes in front of the camera, her ‘on your face attitude’ too is worth taking notice.
Rakhi already shocked everyone by saying that she wanted to work in a x-rated film and then gave some steamy and hot scenes wearing only an underwear in Khamosh .
We just told you that in a forthcoming movie titled ‘Hot Money’, Rakhi appears in an item number that features her wearing nothing but 2000 coins worth Re. 1 each.
And this what the bold babes says about that song: "I am sure this song will create ripples in the industry. My breasts are covered with coins and when I shake with the music, they vibrate and there's a lovely clinking sound."
That dress (or the lack of it) has been designed by none other than her brother Rakesh Sawant, who is also the director of the movie.
And Rakhi doesn’t stop at that. She seems to be saying more and wearing less in front of the camera.
On an idea about date with Emraan Hashmi , Rakhi said: "I have seen that he has kissed every hottie in each film of his. But I think I can teach him a thing or too about passionate lip-lock when we meet up over dinner & wine."
On being told that her music videos are vulgar: “Yeh toh wahi baat hain, din mein bhaiyya, raat mein saiyya! I don’t think there is nothing vulgar about my dance nor the video. Jinko aankh ki sharam hain, woh na dekhe!"
Seems like Mallika Sherawat has some ‘hot’ competition on hand about being bold, both in terms of saying it and doing it.
Not any more.
The terms and conditions of the game are changing and government should take a notice of that.
Please have a look at the blog "Present India : Blame it on Men"
It made me curious about this bold woman. I did some internet search and found this article : Rakhi Sawant – Boldness Unlimited!
Text is reproduced below. You and your brain is the best judge of this situation.
- Satya
Rakhi Sawant – Boldness Unlimited!
04th Oct 2005 13.26 IST
By ApunKaChoice Bureau
The hot Rakhi Sawant isn’t just good at shedding clothes in front of the camera, her ‘on your face attitude’ too is worth taking notice.
Rakhi already shocked everyone by saying that she wanted to work in a x-rated film and then gave some steamy and hot scenes wearing only an underwear in Khamosh .
We just told you that in a forthcoming movie titled ‘Hot Money’, Rakhi appears in an item number that features her wearing nothing but 2000 coins worth Re. 1 each.
And this what the bold babes says about that song: "I am sure this song will create ripples in the industry. My breasts are covered with coins and when I shake with the music, they vibrate and there's a lovely clinking sound."
That dress (or the lack of it) has been designed by none other than her brother Rakesh Sawant, who is also the director of the movie.
And Rakhi doesn’t stop at that. She seems to be saying more and wearing less in front of the camera.
On an idea about date with Emraan Hashmi , Rakhi said: "I have seen that he has kissed every hottie in each film of his. But I think I can teach him a thing or too about passionate lip-lock when we meet up over dinner & wine."
On being told that her music videos are vulgar: “Yeh toh wahi baat hain, din mein bhaiyya, raat mein saiyya! I don’t think there is nothing vulgar about my dance nor the video. Jinko aankh ki sharam hain, woh na dekhe!"
Seems like Mallika Sherawat has some ‘hot’ competition on hand about being bold, both in terms of saying it and doing it.
Comments:
<< Home
498A Section should not be a nightmare. The reason it is so is because as we read here, the police arrest the husband and the family upon the lady's first complain and then the case starts. The lady in question can complain to the police and then the police have to tell her to hire a lawyer to fight the case. The idea seems that the lady likes to harrase the husband and his family and this can be done so easily as she does not have to lift a stick or hire a gunda as the police do that job for her and so the police are guilty here and they should firstly be taken to the court and then the husband. Come on police we have to see you as god figure. Please dont lose your chance to get moksha doing your duty. As clearly it is the police harrasing and not the husband in many cases. So is there a 498A/Police to go legally against the police? These cases will almost get very small in number if this police illegal decision is put to check. Come on police we have to see you as god figure. People are clearly not scared of a letter from the lady's lawyer as they have the time and the money to fight back with the proof we see here. But how they do this and specially from abroad as they have the fear of being arrested in the first place? If one tries to be a Gandhi in 2006 India, he/she gets a bullet bit too quick and seems from the law itself. This is why men prefer to become POI and then NRI and serve abroad places where he is safe to marry. Shame India. Wah!!! UK Guy
# posted by 
: 11:17 AM, November 01, 2006
: 11:17 AM, November 01, 2006
498A Section should not be a nightmare. The reason it is so is because as we read here, the police arrest the husband and the family upon the lady's first complain and then the case starts. The lady in question can complain to the police and then the police have to tell her to hire a lawyer to fight the case. The idea seems that the lady likes to harrase the husband and his family and this can be done so easily as she does not have to lift a stick or hire a gunda as the police do that job for her and so the police are guilty here and they should firstly be taken to the court and then the husband. Come on police we have to see you as god figure. Please dont lose your chance to get moksha doing your duty. As clearly it is the police harrasing and not the husband in many cases. So is there a 498A/Police to go legally against the police? These cases will almost get very small in number if this police illegal decision is put to check. Come on police we have to see you as god figure. People are clearly not scared of a letter from the lady's lawyer as they have the time and the money to fight back with the proof we see here. But how they do this and specially from abroad as they have the fear of being arrested in the first place? If one tries to be a Gandhi in 2006 India, he/she gets a bullet bit too quick and seems from the law itself. Men prefer to go abroad to be POI(Person of Indian Origin?) and then NRI and be safe to marry and serve overseas country after spending India money for education. Wake up India. Wah!!! UK Guy
# posted by : 11:20 AM, November 01, 2006
: 11:20 AM, November 01, 2006
They used to say when you marry a lady, the 2 families also get married. The problems get sorted out by the 2 families. But remember now…..REMEMBER…..NRI guy and and others dont only marry an Indian lady from India but also marries the Indian police, who are the first ones to arrest you before you are found guilty. Why we blame the law? The law is there. The people who put the law in place are the ones to take the responsibility. So why marry an lady from India in the first place
# posted by : 11:02 AM, November 09, 2006
: 11:02 AM, November 09, 2006
FROM THIS 498A SECTION AND HOW IT WORKS, IT SEEMS THAT IT IS VERY VERY SAFE FOR AN INDIAN LADY FROM INDIA TO MARRY AN INDIAN POLICE-MAN, INDIAN MAN LAWYER, INDIAN MAN JUDGE. .....ARE THEY ALL PERFECT AND UNTOUCHABLE BY THE LAW???!!! AND IS THE REST OF THE MEN POPULATION UNTOUCHABLE BY THE WOMEN POPULATION???!!! UK PERSON.
# posted by : 1:05 AM, November 18, 2006
: 1:05 AM, November 18, 2006
I have been looking for sites like this for a long time. Thank you! » » »
Post a Comment
# posted by : 10:20 PM, February 22, 2007
: 10:20 PM, February 22, 2007 << Home
